Englishmen 17th century :: essays research papers

FIRST ESSAY: Thomas Hobbes described the life of most Englishmen in the 17th century as â€Å"nasty, brutish and short.† How far does the evidence presented in Past Speaks chpt. 2, suggest that little had changed by the mid 18th century?   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Chapter two of Past Speaks, covers many different articles that discusses the many social classes that were present in Britain at that time. When Thomas Hobbes described the life of the Englishmen as â€Å"nasty, brutish and short.† he was partially correct. On the contrary he was also mistaken. Thomas Hobbes made a generalization of the Englishmen, and failed to mention some of the upper and profitable people of the British society. Obviously the wealthy and prosperous people were not included in this generalization that is made. Farmers from Norfolk were very successful, as stated in Past Speaks chapter 2, â€Å"Pointing out the practices which have succeeded so nobly here, may perhaps be of some use to other countries possessed of the same advantages, but unknowing in the art of them.† Arthur Young, a traveling one-man bureau, wrote about these farmers and successful cattle-breeding men. He speaks of a man by the name of Robert Bakewell, who turne d out to be a very wealthy man. Bakewell experimented in the breeding of cattle. He managed to breed a large amount of cattle that could produce more meat and less bone, in which he ended up shipping overseas to neighboring countries. Thomas Hobbes again, did not include these men in the comment he had made.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Henri Misson, visiting sportsmen to England did write on the sports and diversions of England. Misson writes â€Å"Anything that looks like fighting is delicious to an Englishman. If two little boys quarrel in the street, then passengers stop, make a ring round them in a moment, and set them against one another, that they may come to fisticuffs.† This piece does support Thomas Hobbes comment on the difference of Englishmen from the 17th to the 18th century. This seemed as little or nothing had changed with the society. Another quote from Past Speaks â€Å"these by-standers are not only other boys, porters and rabble, but all sorts of men of fashion; some thrusting by the mob that they may see plain†. This is evidence that not only the lower social class, but the upper class as well were enthused. This is evidence to Hobbes remark.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Thomas Hobbes however did not believe in Democracy.

A supermarket in california

Poetry Poetry is a form of literary art that uses aesthetic and rhythmic qualities of language to evoke meaning to an audience. In â€Å"A supermarket in California† by Allen Ginsberg, he uses symbolism and literary allusions to convey a man going through a crisis between the modern American consumerism, an individual's detachment with nature; following the ways of his idol Walt Whitman by living a spiritual natural lifestyle and also tell a story about his search for sexual acceptance among the society for homosexuals.Walt Whitman's work deals with nature and how modern ocieties have effects on the natural world. Also the use of Whitman in this poem is a device which Allen Ginsberg used to contract his idols version of reality and also sexuality. Allen Ginsbergs first literary device in the poem, â€Å"A supermarket in California† is the use of symbolism. Symbolism is the use of symbols to represent ideas or qualities. In (line 4) â€Å"l went into the neon fruit mark et†.The supermarket is symbolic of mass production in modern America while the neon is symbolic of how artificial the society has become and also opposes Allen's naturalistic way of living because here is nothing natural about a neon light. However he continues to seek some kind of approval from Walt by asking â€Å"Where are we going â€Å"Walt Whitman†, Overall the supermarket symbolizes how artificial the supermarket has become as a venue for food sales.These symbols relates Allen's his perspective of the supermarket compared to natural food/ street stores/ farmers market and he describes it as a symbol of the man-made consumerist nature of a supermarket. He then went on to talk about the peaches and the penumbras. â€Å"What peaches and what penumbras! Whole families shopping at night! Aisles full of husbands! Wives in the avocados, babies in the tomatoes! And you Garcia Lorca, what were you doing by the watermelon? (Lines 6-8).The fruit symbolizes his yearn for t he American family to be close to nature and got things in little quantities rather than mass produced goods. He also wished the society was still close; his description of the family showed the family all over the place not making unilateral decision and not doing things as a whole rather as individuals. The families is symbolic of how everyone is going about their lives based on the â€Å"society's idea† of what a mainstream family should be hence eading to people lacking uniqueness, authenticity and a sense of self also becoming indistinguishable from the produce (not unique) .In the final part of his poem Allen goes on to talk about how less optimistic he was about the world he lives in. He then questions Whitman; â€Å"where are we going the doors close in an hour† (18) this symbolizes his realization that everything is going to change no matter what. His glorified idea of the natural world seems to be falling apart around him and he realizes it might not last due to the new consumerist nature of modern America. He admits that he feels absurd for having such high opes of seeing the beauty of supermarket commodities in lines 20-21.He realizes there is no place that ne and Walt can to tind W t's ideal place and realizes that their journey through the â€Å"solitary streets† past symbols of a â€Å"lost America† such as cars would only lead them to a lonely life (line 22-25). Allen Ginsbergs second literary device in the poem is the use of literary allusion. Literary allusion is a reference to a work of art, music, history, religion, or another work of literature within a piece of literature.It is pretty obvious that Walt Whitman is the driving force behind the oem; he is mentioned several times and also portrayed as a lonely man and also as a lifestyle along with other poets; however he had several other allusions such as Garcia Lorca in (line 8) who was an influential Spanish poet and an inspiration to Walt, Charn in (line 28) w ho was from the Greek mythology. Allen uses these individuals as a point of reference for his audience to refer to see how much this gotten â€Å"worse† and changed since their era so his reader could get a feel of then and now.Later on it became quiet known that Allen was gay and parts of the poem symbolized and represented a person who is being unsure of his sexuality and omeone who is going through a Journey of self-discover, this can be seen to some clues of Allen referencing Walt and Lorca who were both gay right activists and also homosexual individuals. It is quite clear when Allen states â€Å"l saw you Walt Whitman, childless, lonely grubber, poking among the meats in the refrigerator and eyeing the grocery boys†.Allen is making Walt Whitman's sexuality obvious by calling him a homosexual. Allen isolating Walt, stating that he is childless, lonely and eyeing boys are all clearly accusations at the society since during that time the society was not ccepting of homosexual of the idea of homosexuality and the ideology behind the â€Å"American dream† was a man, a woman, and their children in a house not a man or a woman and a man or a woman and their children.He is makes these comparisons in order to made his readers see how similar he is to Walt. And how he feels they do not belong since the idea of the American dream/modern America didn't accept them for who they are and the only way they can survive is to pretend about who they are. In Allen's poem he uses these literary devices to show the reader that America's onsumerism has caused a detachment between humans and natures.The use of symbolism allows the reader the chance to see Allen's point of view and to also show how much individuals have conformed to the societys new perspective of mainstream and modern America and also show how the society was not accepting of being homosexual and if one tries to defy the societies opinion of â€Å"relationships and marriage† he/she w ould only end up alone. With Literary allusion it helped the readers connect to him; to see where he is coming from literary and also have a historic background of what he is trying to relay.

Wealth Distribution and William Domhoffs Wealth, Income,...

In William Domhoff’s article, Wealth, Income, and Power, he examines wealth distribution in the United States, specifically financial inequality. He concludes that the wealthiest 10% of the United States effectively owns America, and that this is due in large part to an increase in unequal distribution of wealth between 1983 and 2004. Domhoff also states that the unequal wealth distribution is due in large part to tax cuts for the wealthy and the defeat of labor unions. Most of Domhoff’s information is accurate and includes strong, valid arguments and statements. However, there is room for improvement when identifying the subject of what is causing the inequality. The most important points made in Domhoff’s article are his statistics, the†¦show more content†¦William Domhoff’s claims in the article Wealth, Income, and Power, are, for the most part, very strong. He makes strong statements regarding the concentration of wealth in the United States, and backs them up with good sources throughout. The statistics used are valid, and consistent among many trusted sources. The only area where Domhoff’s argument falls short is when he references the causes of wealth inequality. In this portion, his argument is a bit weak and could be strengthened by considering other important factors effecting wealth concentration, rather than limiting it to two seemingly all-important issues. Overall, upon examination of Domhoff’s ideas and sources, he presents an accurate and fairly strong argument about the unequal distribution of wealth in the United States. 1 Edward N. Wolff. â€Å"Recent trends in household wealth in the United States: Rising debt and the middle-class squeeze - an update to 2007,† Working Paper No. 589. Accessed January 13, 2013, http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_589.pdf 2 Hope Forpeace. †20% of Americans own 93% of American Wealth and They Should All Get Tax Cuts,† Newsvine. 2010. Accessed January 14, 2013. http://salemsage.newsvine.com/_news/2010/06/06/4471117-20-of-americans-own-93-of-american-wealth-and-they-should-all-get-tax-cuts 3 Arthur B. Kennickell. â€Å"Ponds and Streams: Wealth and Income in the U.S., 1989 to 2007,† Federal Reserve. 2009. Accessed January 13, 2013.Show MoreRelatedWealth Inequality Of The United States1216 Words   |  5 PagesWealth in the United States is generally thought to be distributed fairly as the highest earners have a higher percentage of wealth. Although this common notion is technically correct, the wealth is not spread as fairly as people might believe. The United States uses a free market, capitalistic economy, which entails wealth inequality. However, the amount of wealth inequality depends on how the government limits the wealthy. Interestingly enough, the government does not have regulations to distributeRead MoreImpact Of Wealth Inequality On The United States1220 Words   |  5 PagesImpacts of Wealth Inequality Wealth in the United States is generally thought to be spread fairly as the highest earners have a higher percentage of wealth. Although this common notion is technically correct, the wealth is not spread as fairly as people might believe. The United States uses a free market, capitalistic economy, which entails wealth inequality. However, the amount of wealth inequality depends on how the government limits the wealthy. Interestingly enough, the government does not haveRead MoreSocial Class in America1217 Words   |  5 Pagesthose who belong to a lower social class. The main reason opportunities are limited are because of America’s social inequality. The social class of America is separated into multiple groups that struggle with each other due to the inequality of power and wealth on the daily basis. Social class has always been influential in America even though many people put forth that someone’s social class is insignificant when building friendships or any other relationship. But the reality is that those thoughtsRead MoreOccupy Wall Street: Positive Impact of the Protest Movement in USA1235 Words   |  5 Pagesare the 99%. This group was initiated so as to address growing income inequality and unequal distribution of wealth in the United States of America between the wealthiest who are few and the rest of the poor people who are the majority In order to achieve their goals the protestors act on consensus- based decision which is being made in general assemblies. Economic and Moral implications involved in this movement includes, Income inequality; Many Americans live below the poverty line. More thanRead MorePrinciples Of Stratification On Society1547 Words   |  7 Pagesâ€Å"Classes in Capitalism and Pre- Capitalism† by Karl Marx, and â€Å"Who Rules America?† by G. William Domhoff. Davis and Moore examine stratification, social class, and positional rank and their effects on individuals and society. Marx examines inequality in society, the relationship between the oppressor and the oppressed or the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, and methods of production and their effects on society. Domhoff examines the roles of corporate communities and the upper class and how they impactRead MoreSome Principles Of Stratification By Kingsley Davis And Wilbert E. Moore1672 Words   |  7 PagesAmerica?† G. William Domhoff, examines the roles of corporate communities and the upper class and how they impact issues in America. Davis and Moore highlight the need for stratification within society and how it impacts different social classes. They argue â€Å"Starting from the proposition that no society is â€Å"classless,† or unstratified, an effort is made to explain, in functional terms, the universal necessity which calls forth stratification in any social system† (16). The unequal distribution of goodsRead MoreDistribution of Wealth1488 Words   |  6 PagesDistribution of Wealth? Wealth has affected american society and evermore has affect the fabric of families. Has the distribution of wealth gotten so out of control that the effect will reverberate for generations to come and as a society can we do something about it. When we were tasked to write this final research paper on one of the topics from the discussions over the past semester i knew that i had to do a topic that i had dealt with on some personal level even know i have experienced manyRead MoreThe Benefits of Raising the Federal Minimum Wage1334 Words   |  6 Pagessaying that your home is being foreclosed. This is the situation faced by thousands of Americans every year due to low income and wealth inequality. The federal minimum wage (FMW) as of April 2014 is $7.25, which is not enough to keep a family of two above the poverty line. There are certain questions on this topic that should be addressed, such as why is poverty and wealth distribution an issue in the United States today? Should the FMW be raised and why? How would raising the FMW affect American familiesRead MoreSocial Justice2427 Words   |  10 Pagesare treated fairly and that all have the same opportunities to partake of and share in the benefits of society. This could mean the end of discrimination based on sex, race, creed, ethnicity, or income. Another form of social justice could be equality through fair taxation and the distribution of wealth, resources, and property. It could also mean equal access to education and job placement for everybody. I believe that social justice is all of these things. In this paper I will explore the ideaRead MoreState Is Not A Unified Entity Essay2323 Words   |  10 Pagesdirections. In this perspective, the fundamental features of the state would then become the historically variable ensemble of practices and techniques that produce, naturalize and manage territorial space as a bounded container within which political power can be exercise to achieve various, relatively well integrated, somewhat changing policy objectives (Jessop 2007:5). Specifically, the state can be defined as a distinct ensemble of institutions and organization whose socio-political accepted function

All About Chimney Pots - Definitions and Photos

The Terminal Stages Of Asbestosis Or Mesothelioma

â€Å"I do not know how many people here have seen the terminal stages of asbestosis or mesothelioma. Not only is it not pretty, but it is damned ugly, and if that is what lies in store for me, I want to control my own exit.† Jim Fitzpatrick MP (Lab, Poplar and Limehouse): 11 Sep 2015: Column 666. â€Å"We are here to protect the most vulnerable in our society, not to legislate to kill them.† This statement might come across strange, unclear and also contradictory to some people, but to some it seems very normal, clear and understandable. This statement simply concludes the fact that some people would rather take their life than go through a serious, painful and life threatening illness. The original word given to this kind of statement is â€Å"Euthanasia†. Euthanasia can be defined as a process which painlessly helps a terminally ill person to die on their request . There are different types of Euthanasia which includes; Voluntary, Involuntary, Non-voluntary, Passive and Active Euthanasia. Voluntary Euthanasia involves situations where the person wants to die and makes it known and the death is being carried out by someone. In cases like this, the people involved usually refuses any medical treatment or any help which might have been given or suggested to them, they just have made up their mind to die. Involuntary Euthanasia this usually does not involve the consent of the patient. Although the patient is able to express his will and also able to make a decision, but

Debate over the Strength of Central Government free essay sample

The period of 1783-1800 was shaped by the debate between those who supported a strong central government and those who wanted more power given to the states. This period dealt with issues surrounding the formations of factions that threatened to split the young nation, the inclusion of a Bill of Rights, and the constitutionality of a national bank. Factions divided the people into those who supported a strong central government and those who wanted more power given to the states. These two groups had differing viewpoints, which influenced decisions regarding the addition of a Bill of Rights and the formation of a national bank. The two major factions that almost disrupted the developing nation were formulated at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. At this convention, delegates representing all states expect Rhode Island formed a new type of government with the creation of the Constitution. In the ratification process America was divided in two, the federalists and anti-federalists. Federalists were in favor of a strong central government and hence supporting the new Constitution, while anti-federalists were in favor of giving the states a greater amount of power, thus opposing it. The opposition to the Constitution spreads from a mistrust of central government due to the grievances of English monarchy. The rights obtained by the central government took away states’ rights as seen in Sections VIII and X of the Constitution of the United States of American (Document 5). Most people who lived in cities, manufacturers, and northern merchants supported federalist views and most small farmers, southerners and frontiersmen sided with the anti-federalist views. Key federalists included Alexander Hamilton, John Adams, John Marshall, John Jay, and James Madison. In order to promote ratification Hamilton, Jay, and Madison published a series of Federalist Papers, (Document 8). On the anti-federalist side, important figures included Thomas Jefferson, Samuel Adams, Aaron Burr, Richard Henry Lee, and Patrick Henry. These men were in favor of the Article of Confederation, which greatly limited the powers of the central government and maximized the powers of state rights. One major flaw that the anti-federalist expressed concerning the Constitution was the lack of a Bill of Rights. A Bill of Rights would secure the rights of the people and prevent the central government from becoming too powerful. The federalists argued that the system of checks and balances would prevent tyranny. However, when many states ratified the Constitution they attached a list of amendments to be added in a Bill of Rights. James Madison compiled these amendments and presented twelve of them to Congress. Ten were passed and added to the Constitution resulting in the American Bill of Rights. One of the most significant amendments is the tenth amendment, which states â€Å"All powers not delegated to the federal government belong to the states or to the people,† (Document 6). This declared that whatever was not restricted or allowed in the Constitution was a right retained by the people or states. The most heated debate amongst federalists and anti-federalist was over the constitutionality of a national bank. Anti-federalists believed the central government did not have the authority to create a national bank, while the federalists believed it was stated in the elastic clause of the Constitution. The United States Constitution was written in a vague terminology by the Founding Fathers, which added to the contention amongst Americans. Secretary of Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, proposed a national bank to â€Å"wish the most proper and speedy measures may be taken, to discharge both foreign and domestic debt,† (Document 7). The anti-federalists, in particular Thomas Jefferson, who favored a strict interpretation of the Constitution, rejected this notion and claimed it was unconstitutional because it was not a power directly stated in the document. However, Hamilton argued that the â€Å"elastic clause† as seen in Article I Section VIII, the powers of congress (Document 5), allowed the central government to establish a bank because it was necessary and proper and constitutional, (Document 1). Hamilton, along with the other federalists, favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution. The debate of having a national bank was resolved by giving the national bank a twenty year charter to test it out. This debacle leads to further issues on the topic of government rights versus state rights, and almost leads to the destruction of the country. When the Constitution was in its ratification process the small states sided with federalists in wanting a stronger central government, while larger states sided with anti-federalists in wanting more state rights. This was seen in two important proposals to the Constitutional convention surrounding the executive branch. First, the New Jersey Plan or the small states plans, wanted one house that has equal representation, with one vote per state. This would make small states more powerful and have the same say in the government as the larger states did. Second, was the Virginia Plan or the large states plan (Document 4), was to have a bicameral legislative, with one house with representation based on population, and the other elected through that house. This gave more power to the states, the larger states gaining a clear advantage as well. These two plans clearly portrayed the different ideas of federalists and anti-federalist and demonstrated how vital a role states played throughout this period. This dispute was settled with the great compromise, proposed by Roger Sherman, making a bicameral legislature with the Senate with equal representation for each state and the House of Representatives based on population and direct election. The debate between those who supported a strong central government and those who wanted more state rights truly shaped the period between 1783 and 1800. It dealt with the creation of two factions that could have potentially destroyed the emerging nation and the debates over a Bill of Rights and a national bank. If it were not for the ideas, factions, and development that occurred during the making of the Constitution and the continued building of our nation after, the government of America would not have been as successful as it is today. The Idea that were fought over from 1783 to 1800 has shaped our country and allowed us to be the great nation that we are.

The Papacy as represented in Peruginoapos;s The Gift of the Keys Essay Example

The Papacy as represented in Peruginos The Gift of the Keys Paper The Papacy as represented in Peruginos The Gift of the Keys Before I discuss the importance of various symbols in Peruginos The Gift of the Keys, it is important to note that the vast majority of my knowledge about the significance of the participants and architecture in the painting come from the writing of art historian Carol Lewine, whom in her recent book discusses the fifteenth century frescoes of the Sistine Chapel (65-74). I will be following her identifications, and adding to them my own interpretations of the contribution of artistic conception and composition to meaning and effect. What makes Peruginos painting significant are the strong political, religious, and social comments made through the powerful symbols in Peruginos work. One of thefirst, and most important, elements to notice in The Gift of The Keys is the way nearly every object in the painting manages to focus attention on the central figures of Christ and Peter. Even though the two are not physically separat ed from the rest of the figures in the scene, it becomes immediately obvious to the viewer that Christ and Peter are the principal subjects of this painting. To the left of Christ stand six apostles, the other six apostles (counting Peter) positioned immediately to his right. Also flanking Christ and Peter are the dual representations of the Arch of Constantine, and immediately in bac of Christ and Peter is the glorious Temple of Solomon. The important aspect of this centralization of Christ and Peter is that it shows that even with all of the other symbols in the painting, the most important one is the gift of the keys. When Christ hands the two keys to Peter, he symbolically hands him the power to distinguish between good and evil, and the power to bind and loose or to absolve sinners after appropriate penance, as Lewine puts it. (70 Lewine) Peter is often thought of roughly as thefirst pop